Journal of People thanks its readers and well-wishers for their support throughout the year. From today, JoP is going to this season’s holiday. It will commence its services next year. JoP wishes a happy new year to all its readers and well-wishers.

REFORM OUR STUDY

[Editors’ Note: Journal of People posts this article by Mao Tse-tung in remembrance of his birth anniversary on 26th of December, 2018.]

[Comrade Mao Tse-tung made this report to a cadres’ meeting in Yenan. The report and the two articles, “Rectify the Party’s Style of Work” and “Oppose Stereotyped Party Writing”, are Comrade Mao Tse-tung’s basic works on the rectification movement. In these he summed up, on the ideological plane, past differences in the Party over the Party line and analysed the petty-bourgeois ideology and style which, masquerading as Marxism-Leninism, were prevalent in the Party, and which chiefly manifested themselves in subjectivist and sectarian tendencies, their form of expression being stereotyped Party writing. Comrade Mao Tse-tung called for a Party-wide movement of Marxist-Leninist education to rectify style of work in accordance with the ideological principles of Marxism-Leninism. His call very quickly led to a great debate between proletarian and petty-bourgeois ideology inside and outside the Party. This consolidated the position of proletarian ideology inside and outside the Party, enabled the broad ranks of cadres to take a great step forward ideologically and the Party to achieve unprecedented unity.]

---

I propose that we should reform the method and the system of study throughout the Party. The reasons are as follows:

Reiterating Mao on December 26, his birth anniversary

by Farooque Chowdhury

MR Online | December 27, 2018

Reiterating Mao’s teachings is one of the essentials in the area of political education as a new generation is joining people’s struggle.

The class struggle question is one of the areas to learn from Mao Tse-tung [also spelled Mao Zedong] [b. December 26, 1893] as now-a-days confusion dominates political position of a group of “progressives” and “anti-imperialists” engaged with mongering “rights” of sects and sub-sects but “forgetting” rights of the entire working people. An amazing group in a conflict-laden reality! So, Mao’s theoretical formulations on the issue of class struggle demand renewed attention.

Revisionism American Style

by Christopher C Black

The latest Sea of Azov provocations in Crimea and the constant rumble of war preparations by the Ukrainians, obviously backed and most likely egged on by NATO, indicate Washington and its vassals are not yet ready to give up their dangerous harassment of Russia.

Calls by Canada’s National Defence Committee for increased “sanctions” that is, economic warfare, against Russia, and for an increased NATO presence in the Black Sea, directly threatening Russia’s southern flank and its Crimea territory, used the term “revisionist power” to describe Russia. This term has also been used by American and NATO diplomats and generals concerning China. It is a term that is never defined. To Marxists it rings of not being true to the cause of revolution, and that is, until recently, its most common usage. Lately it has been used to label anyone who questions official or standard narratives of history with the sense of condemnation for “revisiting” the facts and constructing an alternative narrative that more closely fits the facts. If you claim the attacks on Yugoslavia, or Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya or Syria were acts of aggression instead of” humanitarian interventions”, you are now labelled a “revisionist.” If you deny Russia influenced the elections in the USA or Europe or deny their new allegations of Russia taking over social media, or [claim] that Ukrainian ships violated Russian waters in the Kerch Strait, you are a “revisionist.” In other words it is a term of censorship. So the adoption of the word by the NATO war machine in its propaganda against Russia and China, as a strategic concept, is puzzling. Are the Russians and Chinese betraying a revolution? Are they rewriting history? Since it is almost never defined in the articles or essays pumped out by all the propaganda organs of NATO the public is left guessing as to what it can mean-but one thing they are sure of, it must be bad.

Obama Admits Bipartisan Capitalist ‘Washington Consensus’ Fueled Far-Right & Multiplied Inequality

Real News Network | December 21, 2018

Story Transcript

BARACK OBAMA: Sometimes you go to Wall Street, and folks will be grumbling about, ‘Anti-business…’ And I say, ‘Have you checked where your stocks were when I came in office, and where they are now?’ What? What are you talking, what are you complaining about? Just say thank you, please.